Isaac Was Abraham's Only Child; Ishmael Was Not His Biological Child, According To Apostle Suleman - Legitvibes Now

: While Genesis 22:2 uses "only son," other scriptures like Genesis 25:9 state that "his sons Isaac and Ishmael buried him," acknowledging both as his children.

: The teaching aligns with the broader theological view that Ishmael was a "son of the flesh" (born of human effort through Hagar), while Isaac was the "son of the promise" (born through divine intervention). Broader Biblical Context : While Genesis 22:2 uses "only son," other

: In mainstream theology, the distinction is usually made between legitimacy in the covenant rather than biological paternity. According to a teaching by , Ishmael is

According to a teaching by , Ishmael is not considered the biological son of " Abraham ," but rather the son of Abram . Suleman posits that Isaac is Abraham's only son because God only addressed him as "Abraham" after the covenant change, which occurred before Isaac's birth. Key Arguments from Apostle Suleman's Teaching According to a teaching by