2022---fischst-bchen-im--ko-test--beliebte-marken-fallen-durch -

The test results were particularly damaging for market leaders. While generic "store brands" often performed surprisingly well, the "big names" struggled.

Limiting consumption of breaded, pre-fried products for children, as they are most vulnerable to 3-MCPD exposure.

. Both brands stood out for their lack of harmful contaminants and their superior commitment to sustainable fishing and supply chain transparency. Conclusion and Consumer Recommendations The test results were particularly damaging for market

Paying attention to the source of the fish (looking for Pacific Pollack from sustainable stocks).

The 2022 evaluation by Öko-Test revealed significant quality discrepancies in one of Germany's most popular frozen convenience foods: fish sticks. Out of 19 products tested, including both conventional and organic options, the results were sobering. Many established, high-profile brands failed to meet basic health and sustainability standards, primarily due to chemical contamination and transparency issues in the supply chain. Summary of Key Findings including both conventional and organic options

While most brands used MSC-certified fish, the test found that "certified" did not always equate to "sustainable" in practice. Brands often lacked transparency regarding the exact catch methods and the specific fishing grounds used. Performance of Major Brands

This private label also failed the test, receiving a "Poor" rating due to mineral oil residues. the results were sobering. Many established

Critical Evaluation of the 2022 Öko-Test Results for Frozen Fish Sticks